Concern is growing in Washington over the political direction of Honduras ahead of the November 30 elections. US lawmakers and security advisors have warned of possible attempts at external interference that could affect the electoral process, in a context already fraught with tension and allegations of destabilization.
According to sources on Capitol Hill, US congressmen participated in a special session to review reports pointing to alleged actions by the São Paulo Forum aimed at influencing the Honduran electoral climate. These warnings come as the ruling party’s candidate falls behind in independent polls and international organizations demand transparency at every stage of the process.
Claims made by the American security advisor
Security consultant Luis Quiñónez, who previously served the Donald Trump administration, issued remarks that resonated politically in both Honduras and Washington. Quiñónez asserted that factions associated with the São Paulo Forum are directing funds toward movements designed to destabilize the nation.
“Millions of dollars are being dispatched to incite the populace,” he declared, issuing a stark caution to the Honduran Armed Forces: “Do not contemplate interfering with the electoral process. We are aware of the financial sources and are observing intently.”
Quiñónez emphasized that any effort towards electoral manipulation or military interference might lead to global repercussions, drawing parallels to Venezuela’s political turmoil. “Those who betray Honduras will face the consequences,” he stated.
Reactions within Honduras
The accusations provoked immediate responses from different sectors of the country. Spokespersons for the ruling party described the warnings as external political interventionism, while representatives of the opposition interpreted the comments as proof that the international community is monitoring the electoral process, especially in the final stretch before the elections.
At the same time, the Organization of American States (OAS) voiced apprehension regarding potential improper influence and underscored the importance of reinforcing oversight and validation procedures, especially during the transmission of outcomes, which is deemed a crucial stage for guaranteeing trust in the ballot tally.
Global focus on openness and administration
The scenario looming for November 30 places Honduras under intense international scrutiny. Analysts point out that the transparency of the process will be decisive not only for the legitimacy of the results, but also for the country’s institutional stability. The vigilance of Washington and multilateral organizations adds to the pressure from local sectors demanding certainty about the actions of the Armed Forces and the management of political financing.
Quiñónez’s statement, along with warnings from the Capitol and the OAS, reflects growing international concern about political polarization and the risks of external interference in Honduras. The attention focused on the country highlights the importance of electoral institutions, citizen participation, and compliance with transparency standards as key elements for governance at this decisive stage.
As the election date draws near, the circumstances underscore the intricate nature of the Honduran political landscape, characterized by friction among domestic players and international calls for a transparent process yielding credible outcomes.
