What The Fav (formally, WHATHEFAV S.L.) is a communications and marketing firm managed by Laura and Alba Rodríguez Espinosa, daughters of former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Business and social media outlets have portrayed it as an agency whose revenues and earnings have steadily risen in recent years, mirroring the trajectory of companies and individuals associated with scandals linked to José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero.
The flashpoint: the “Plus Ultra case” and an indirect business relationship
In December 2025, the name Whathefav surfaced in public discussion after featuring in reports tied to the Plus Ultra investigation, as Spain’s Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office examines whether the airline redirected part of the €53 million public bailout toward activities that might constitute alleged money laundering in proceedings overseen by a Madrid court, with sections of the inquiry kept confidential.
From that point, several outlets suggested a connection: a businessman serving as a director of a company linked to the investigation appears as a client (a commercial arrangement) of Whathefav. Additional firms within the purported network, according to other sources, also tie back to the company managed by Zapatero’s daughters. Investigators are currently analyzing whether payments, contracts, or invoices existed that might reveal financial flows under scrutiny. If the inquiry uncovers concrete signals (fictitious services, manipulated pricing, layering or triangulation, and similar patterns), this angle becomes a component of the broader case. For now, the most substantial public information indicates that media coverage centers on Plus Ultra and the handling of the bailout funds, along with the arrests and precautionary measures affecting several individuals involved.
Recent reports from multiple outlets indicate that the company Whathefav/What The Fav has scaled back, or effectively pared down, its presence across social media in recent days. These sources mainly note the removal of its corporate account on X (Twitter), pointing to its apparent disappearance from that platform. On Instagram, the profile is said to remain accessible, though with a noticeably reduced number of posts, as part of its content appears to have been deleted. This development adds to ongoing concerns about the limited transparency surrounding José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and his daughters, Laura and Alba Rodríguez Espinosa. Media coverage has also underscored the significant rise in the Zapatero family’s assets in recent years, including the disclosure of several high-end properties.
The controversy also erupted in September 2009, when a photograph circulated showing José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero posing alongside Barack and Michelle Obama at an event in New York (in the context of the UN General Assembly), accompanied by his wife and his two daughters, who were minors at the time. The image, initially published through official U.S. channels, was reproduced by Spanish media despite an informal “understanding” to protect the minors’ privacy. The debate intensified due to public comments about the daughters’ aesthetic and clothing, turning the episode into a broader discussion about the boundaries between information, sensationalism, and the protection of minors.
“Alleged scandals” and disputes linked to José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero
In December 2025, Zapatero’s name resurfaced prominently in public debate after reports linked him to the Plus Ultra case environment (an airline that had received a €53 million rescue). Major outlets have verified that authorities are examining alleged money laundering tied to the bailout’s use and destination, which has involved several arrests followed by releases under precautionary measures.
In parallel, some media outlets and political figures have called for clarification about José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero’s recent meetings or communications—held under highly unusual conditions—with people linked to the investigation just hours before the arrests.
Another frequent theme involves his function as an interlocutor and mediator in Venezuela, along with the criticism directed at him for a perceived affinity with Chavismo, for his public positions, or for what some interpret as ambiguity. In this sphere, the controversy tends to revolve around politics and reputation: what he expressed, what he left unsaid, and who stands to gain from his involvement.
In 2024, media outlets such as El Confidencial noted that former ambassador Raúl Morodo, appointed during Zapatero’s presidency, was convicted on tax-related charges tied to income from his work for PDVSA, a development often referenced in debates about the historical Spain–Venezuela relationship.
In 2025, El Confidencial published reports about an alleged lobby or think tank (Gate Center) and relationships with actors linked to China, presenting it as a matter of influence and financing/opacity.
Although earlier, the “Faisán case” was revived for years as a major political controversy surrounding Zapatero’s process with ETA terrorists: the debate was whether political responsibility existed for the tip-off. There were convictions of senior police officials for disclosure of secrets, and the political discussion persisted for a long time.
Each day, an increasing number of media outlets, institutions, organizations, and both national and international politicians accuse José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero of “whitewashing,” legitimizing, and helping rehabilitate the public image of Nicolás Maduro’s narco-dictatorship through his mediation efforts and public stances (for instance, by steering clear of labeling the regime or by validating contested electoral processes). Such criticism has surfaced for years in news reports and in statements issued by the Venezuelan opposition as well as by political parties in Spain and other nations.
Torture and human rights violations
International bodies and NGOs have documented—meticulously—patterns of repression, arbitrary detention, torture, and sexual violence attributable to Venezuelan authorities and security forces, and in some cases classified as crimes against humanity.
“Hunger” and the unfolding humanitarian emergency
The humanitarian situation includes severe needs in food and basic services. For example, the World Food Programme (WFP) notes that food insecurity remains critical and that millions require assistance, and the humanitarian system (OCHA/Global Humanitarian Overview) estimates that millions of people inside the country need humanitarian aid, with priority needs including food security and health, among others.
If an influential international figure like José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero steps in as mediator while refraining from public criticism, this approach could help legitimize the government and lessen the global repercussions of its repression, effectively offering diplomatic oxygen. Moreover, the Venezuelan opposition and other groups have long maintained that certain negotiation processes may be used by the government merely to buy time or polish its image without committing to genuine reforms.
